chevron in light blue
Back
Sep 21, 2016
|
Lockton Edge
Edge
Admin

Global Marine Premiums dropped USD 3.5 billion in 2015

The European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) was extended to cover emissions from shipping as of 1st January 2024.

The EU ETS is limited by a 'cap' on the number of emission allowances. Within the cap, companies receive or buy emission allowances, which they can trade as needed. The cap decreases every year, ensuring that total emissions fall.

Each allowance gives the holder the right to emit:

  • One tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2), or;
  • The equivalent amount of other powerful greenhouse gases, nitrous oxide (N2O) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs).
  • The price of one ton of CO2 allowance under the EU ETS has fluctuated between EUR 60 and almost EUR 100 in the past two years. The total cost of emissions will vary based on the cost of the allowance at the time of purchase, the vessel’s emissions profile and the total volume of voyages performed within the EU ETS area. The below is for illustration purposes:
  • ~A 30.000 GT passenger ship has total emissions of 20.000 tonnes in a reporting year, of which 9.000 are within the EU, 7.000 at berth within the EU and 4.000 are between the EU and an outside port. The average price of the allowance is EUR 75 per tonne. The total cost would be as follows:
  • ~~9.000 * EUR 75 = EUR 675.000
  • ~~7.000 * EUR 75 = EUR 525.000
  • ~~4.000 * EUR 75 * 50% = EUR 150.000
  • ~~Total = EUR 1.350.000 (of which 40% is payable in 2024)
  • For 2024, a 60% rebate is admitted to the vessels involved. However, this is reduced to 30% in 2025, before payment is due for 100% with effect from 2026.
  • Emissions reporting is done for each individual ship, where the ship submits their data to a verifier (such as a class society) which in turns allows the shipowner to issue a verified company emissions report. This report is then submitted to the administering authority, and it is this data that informs what emission allowances need to be surrendered to the authority.
  • The sanctions for non- compliance are severe, and in the case of a ship that has failed to comply with the monitoring and reporting obligations for two or more consecutive reporting periods, and where other enforcement measures have failed to ensure compliance, the competent authority of an EEA port of entry may issue an expulsion order. Where such a ship flies the flag of an EEA country and enters or is found in one of its ports, the country concerned will, after giving the opportunity to the company concerned to submit its observations, detain the ship until the company fulfils its monitoring and reporting obligations.
  • Per the EU’s Implementing Regulation, it is the Shipowner who remains ultimately responsible for complying with the EU ETS system.

There are a number of great resources on the regulatory and practical aspects of the system – none better than the EU’s own:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02003L0087-20230605

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/transport/reducing-emissions-shipping-sector_en

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/what-eu-ets_en

IUMI – the International Union of Marine Insurance – has issued a press release announcing that global marine underwriting premiums were down by 10.5% in 2015 and warns that continued uncertainty lies ahead:

IUMI –– unveiling its annual statistical report on the marine insurance market at today’s conference in Genova, announced global underwriting premiums for 2015 of USD 29.9bn. This is a 10.5% reduction on the 2014 figure.
Vice-Chairman of IUMI’s Facts & Figures Committee, Astrid Seltmann explains: “Part of the reduction can be attributed to the strong US dollar as compared with other currencies but this is not the whole picture, particularly for hull and offshore energy where much of the original business is written in USD. All business lines suffered a real reduction in premium income due, in the main, to a sluggish global economy, low commodity prices and reduced activity, specifically in the offshore sector.”

The 2015 total comprised income from the following regions:

• Europe 50.4%
• Asia Pacific 27.1%
• Latin America 9.8%
• North America 5.9%
• Other 6.8%
and the following business lines:
• Global hull 25%
• Transport/cargo 52.9%
• Marine liability 7.1%
• Offshore/energy 15%

Technical insurance results for the 2014 underwriting year deteriorated strongly for cargo, hull and energy sectors compared with last year’s reported data for the same period. Results always deteriorate over time due to the lag in registering and paying claims, but the deterioration in 2014 was above average. This was due to substantial, but not unexpected, increases in reported outstanding loss reserves for the 2014 underwriting year. There were a number of major claims occurring in 2015 which were attached to the 2014 underwriting year but actual amounts were not known when last year’s figures were published. These major claims included Tianjin (cargo); a series of major hull losses (representing an increase in costly hull losses compared with the relative benign previous year); and a high number of costly offshore energy related losses. A proportion of these losses were attributed to the 2014 underwriting year whilst the remainder fell within the 2015 underwriting year.

Cargo sector
Premium income in the cargo sector reached USD 15.8 bn for 2014 which is a 9.1% reduction on the 2014 figure. However, the strong US dollar masked the real income number which made it difficult to identify any real market development. The Tianjin disaster is the largest cargo loss ever recorded and its full effects on the 2014 and 2015 underwriting years are still unclear. The risks of costly cargo claims are expected to increase in the future with the increasing accumulation of values in ports and on single vessels, and a higher probability for claims caused by natural catastrophes. The 2015 underwriting year began with a cargo loss ratio that was higher than in 2014. The Chinese economic slowdown coupled with a slide in commodity prices will continue to impact negatively on world trade and, consequently, cargo insurance premiums. These uncertainties make it difficult to predict future earnings but 2016 has the potential for large claims connected with Hanjin Shipping’s current difficulties and the loss of the Amos 6 satellite.

Hull sector
The hull sector achieved a premium income of USD 7.5 bn for 2014 which was a 8.4% reduction on the 2014 figure. Exchange rates are likely to have impacted this number but to a lesser degree than for cargo, due to the global nature of the portfolio. Although the world fleet continues to grow, the average insured vessel value has been reducing which has had a correspondingly negative effect on premium income. Claims frequency continues a downward trend as does total loss frequency despite a minor uptick in 2015. Repair costs are stable or slightly reducing which is likely to be a result of a strong US dollar – premiums are collected in US dollars whereas repair costs are paid-out in local currencies. 2014 saw an exceptionally low number of major losses but that number returned to normal levels last year. So far the losses this year have been low but past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results, therefore the remainder of this year and into 2017 is not easy to predict.

Offshore energy
Premium income in this sector dropped a massive 20% to USD 4.5 bn in 2015. The majority of business was transacted in US dollars and so the strong dollar could not be culpable for this decrease. Income is likely to drop further as planned projects are postponed or cancelled. Hurricane/weather issues have not made any real impact in recent years but a series of high profile losses in 2015 have had a significant effect. The strong drop in premiums is expected to continue into 2016 and current conditions dictate that a market upturn is not expected for some time. The low oil price has forced the cancellation/postponement of a number of offshore projects, particularly in deep-water and in the Arctic region. Low interest rates and stock market instability is also likely to impact negatively in the future.

Outlook
The 2016 market remains challenging for all lines of business. Although claims reported during the first six months of 2016 appear to be relatively modest, in all marine lines the potential for a major claim resulting from the increased accumulations risk is always a possibility. Patrizia Kern-Ferretti, Chairman of IUMI’s Facts & Figures Committee said: “Commodity prices are weak and freight rates are low and these persistent soft market conditions are challenging for marine insurers. Uncertainty has also been driven by the increasing and unknown risk of accumulations and a growth in M&A activity across the globe. Although we are hopeful that the continuing global economic recovery will strengthen world trade and therefore lend greater support to our sector, marine insurers must adapt to this changing environment if they are to survive and remain effective in the future”

IUMI’s total world-wide premium coverage has constantly improved and is now close to 95%. It now includes data from all relevant marine insurance markets including Asia, Latin America and Africa. Care should be taken when making comparisons with earlier figures as coverage in those years was not as extensive. Similarly, “global” loss ratios for hull, energy and cargo do not encompass all regions and so are not true reflections of the USD 29.9bn marine market. Although the loss ratio data is reported from the major marine insurance markets (Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, the Nordic countries, Italy, United Kingdom and the US), such information from Asia, Latin America or Africa is not yet available. Caution should be applied.

IUMI’s full presentation is available to download from www.iumi.com

SOURCE: IUMI

No items found.