chevron in light blue
Back
Jun 30, 2021
|
Lockton Edge
Edge
Norway

Marine rates continue up says Gard

The European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) was extended to cover emissions from shipping as of 1st January 2024.

The EU ETS is limited by a 'cap' on the number of emission allowances. Within the cap, companies receive or buy emission allowances, which they can trade as needed. The cap decreases every year, ensuring that total emissions fall.

Each allowance gives the holder the right to emit:

  • One tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2), or;
  • The equivalent amount of other powerful greenhouse gases, nitrous oxide (N2O) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs).
  • The price of one ton of CO2 allowance under the EU ETS has fluctuated between EUR 60 and almost EUR 100 in the past two years. The total cost of emissions will vary based on the cost of the allowance at the time of purchase, the vessel’s emissions profile and the total volume of voyages performed within the EU ETS area. The below is for illustration purposes:
  • ~A 30.000 GT passenger ship has total emissions of 20.000 tonnes in a reporting year, of which 9.000 are within the EU, 7.000 at berth within the EU and 4.000 are between the EU and an outside port. The average price of the allowance is EUR 75 per tonne. The total cost would be as follows:
  • ~~9.000 * EUR 75 = EUR 675.000
  • ~~7.000 * EUR 75 = EUR 525.000
  • ~~4.000 * EUR 75 * 50% = EUR 150.000
  • ~~Total = EUR 1.350.000 (of which 40% is payable in 2024)
  • For 2024, a 60% rebate is admitted to the vessels involved. However, this is reduced to 30% in 2025, before payment is due for 100% with effect from 2026.
  • Emissions reporting is done for each individual ship, where the ship submits their data to a verifier (such as a class society) which in turns allows the shipowner to issue a verified company emissions report. This report is then submitted to the administering authority, and it is this data that informs what emission allowances need to be surrendered to the authority.
  • The sanctions for non- compliance are severe, and in the case of a ship that has failed to comply with the monitoring and reporting obligations for two or more consecutive reporting periods, and where other enforcement measures have failed to ensure compliance, the competent authority of an EEA port of entry may issue an expulsion order. Where such a ship flies the flag of an EEA country and enters or is found in one of its ports, the country concerned will, after giving the opportunity to the company concerned to submit its observations, detain the ship until the company fulfils its monitoring and reporting obligations.
  • Per the EU’s Implementing Regulation, it is the Shipowner who remains ultimately responsible for complying with the EU ETS system.

There are a number of great resources on the regulatory and practical aspects of the system – none better than the EU’s own:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02003L0087-20230605

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/transport/reducing-emissions-shipping-sector_en

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/what-eu-ets_en

Hull insurance rates were up by some 9% during H1 and could be set to increase by between 5% and 10% in the second half, according to Gard’s chief underwriting officer Bjørnar Andresen in an interview reported in Lloyd’s List.

While much of the increase could be attributed to a general hardening of the hull market, another factor, compounding the general rises, came from rising costs at repair yards, caused in part by the Covid-19 pandemic and in part by increasing steel prices.

Andresen said in an interview that there had been no increase in casualty frequencies – “if anything the trend has been benign” – but the cost of repair had increased. “The spare parts, the steel and the yards themselves when doing the work, are asking much higher prices than in the past, so individual claims are more expensive.”

“Now we see that when you have a performing account, you actually can limit your increase. If you have losses on a hull account, it will go up much more,” Andresen said.

On the liability side, Andresen said that Covid-19 had taken its toll on the underwriting result, but that it was not a major event-type incident. “It’s lots of work, more a matter of exhaustion on people, and aggregates into lots of claims of lesser amounts that makes an impact on the balance sheet”, he said.

The CUO also reported that there had been significant deterioration in the 2019 policy year, while for the 2021 year, although there had been two significant events in H1 (since February 20th 2021) – X-Press Pearl and Ever Given – it was too soon to say how the whole policy year would pan out. He noted that in 2020 H1 was dreadful, but H2 had been benign.

All clubs have been referring to the increase in the relative importance of pool claims in recent years, and Andresen was no exception. He noted that there had been three consecutive years of significant pool losses (those above $10m), but he cautioned that it was “too early to talk about trend shift”.

He felt that, with combined ratios ranging from 104% at Gard to as high as above 140% for some other clubs, there was little doubt that rates would rise for P&I, although the extent of the increases would differ between clubs.

Andresen also referred to the elephant in the room, the fact that the International Group concluded a two-year reinsurance deal in early 2019, and so therefore had avoided any rate re-evaluation as a result of the events of 2020, and that there was zero chance that reinsurance rates from February 2021 would not be higher.

Andresen noted that reinsurance markets were generally up by about 10%, but that the pressure was beginning to ease at the mid-year renewals.

Andresen warned that the massive publicity surrounding the Ever Given incident could mean reinsurance underwriters would be more wary of taking on shipping risk.

“Having said that, this is a special contract. Although we are dependent on the larger reinsurance market, it is a very large contract handled on its own merits, so it’s hard to tell what the rates will be this year. But owners will have to expect a rise,” he warned.

SOURCE: LLOYDS’ LIST / INSURANCE MARINE NEWS

No items found.