chevron in light blue
Back
Jan 7, 2020
|
Lockton Edge
Edge
Norway

Neon goes into run-off as AFG pulls out of Lloyd’s

The European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) was extended to cover emissions from shipping as of 1st January 2024.

The EU ETS is limited by a 'cap' on the number of emission allowances. Within the cap, companies receive or buy emission allowances, which they can trade as needed. The cap decreases every year, ensuring that total emissions fall.

Each allowance gives the holder the right to emit:

  • One tonne of carbon dioxide (CO2), or;
  • The equivalent amount of other powerful greenhouse gases, nitrous oxide (N2O) and perfluorocarbons (PFCs).
  • The price of one ton of CO2 allowance under the EU ETS has fluctuated between EUR 60 and almost EUR 100 in the past two years. The total cost of emissions will vary based on the cost of the allowance at the time of purchase, the vessel’s emissions profile and the total volume of voyages performed within the EU ETS area. The below is for illustration purposes:
  • ~A 30.000 GT passenger ship has total emissions of 20.000 tonnes in a reporting year, of which 9.000 are within the EU, 7.000 at berth within the EU and 4.000 are between the EU and an outside port. The average price of the allowance is EUR 75 per tonne. The total cost would be as follows:
  • ~~9.000 * EUR 75 = EUR 675.000
  • ~~7.000 * EUR 75 = EUR 525.000
  • ~~4.000 * EUR 75 * 50% = EUR 150.000
  • ~~Total = EUR 1.350.000 (of which 40% is payable in 2024)
  • For 2024, a 60% rebate is admitted to the vessels involved. However, this is reduced to 30% in 2025, before payment is due for 100% with effect from 2026.
  • Emissions reporting is done for each individual ship, where the ship submits their data to a verifier (such as a class society) which in turns allows the shipowner to issue a verified company emissions report. This report is then submitted to the administering authority, and it is this data that informs what emission allowances need to be surrendered to the authority.
  • The sanctions for non- compliance are severe, and in the case of a ship that has failed to comply with the monitoring and reporting obligations for two or more consecutive reporting periods, and where other enforcement measures have failed to ensure compliance, the competent authority of an EEA port of entry may issue an expulsion order. Where such a ship flies the flag of an EEA country and enters or is found in one of its ports, the country concerned will, after giving the opportunity to the company concerned to submit its observations, detain the ship until the company fulfils its monitoring and reporting obligations.
  • Per the EU’s Implementing Regulation, it is the Shipowner who remains ultimately responsible for complying with the EU ETS system.

There are a number of great resources on the regulatory and practical aspects of the system – none better than the EU’s own:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02003L0087-20230605

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/transport/reducing-emissions-shipping-sector_en

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/what-eu-ets_en

American Financial Group, Inc. has announced that it is pulling out of underwriting in the Lloyd’s marketplace, with its Neon business there set to go into run-off.

American Financial Group (AFG) said that it plans to exit the Lloyd’s of London insurance market in 2020.

To achieve this, the company said that it has begun actions to place its Lloyd’s subsidiaries including its Lloyd’s Managing Agency, Neon Underwriting Ltd., into run-off.

AFG said it will work with Neon and it’s regulators to make sure the company continues to meet its obligations to policyholders and that it achieves an orderly run-off of its insurance and reinsurance operations.

Scathingly, the company said that both Neon and its predecessor Marketform did not meet AFG’s profitability objectives since AFG’s purchase of Marketform in 2008.

Having reviewed Neon’s expected results for 2019, as well as its 2020 prospects, AFG said it has determined that Neon will not meet its return expectations.

Neon accounted for roughly 7% of AFG’s property and casualty net written premiums in 2019.

AFG said that it anticipates taking a non-core after-tax charge in the region of $50 million to $60 million in the fourth quarter of 2019 to pay for Neon reserve strengthening and expenses related to the exit costs associated with the run-off of this business.

So the demise of the Neon business appears set, as it heads into run-off allowing AFG to focus on more profitable opportunities.

It’s another sign that underwriting businesses need to have efficiency, or scale, reach and diversification, if they are to generate sustainable returns that investors will be happy with over the cycle.

Performance issues have dogged Neon since the days of Marketform and unfortunately the business has never been able to shake that off, resulting in a difficult end for the firm.

Source: Reinsurance News, https://www.reinsurancene.ws/

No items found.